Its useful to remember these points: Reviewers have, on the whole, given time and effort to constructively criticize your article. The above rules are strict and hold even if your submission has undergone extensive revisions. If there are requests that you cannot meet, you need to address these in your response providing a logical, reasoned explanation for why the study is not detrimentally affected by not making the changes requested. This time, yes, absolutely send a brief email thanking the agent for their consideration and feedback. This online, on-demand learning program guides you through the publishing process. As an intern, I was able to read through the agencys slush pile, discuss that days haul with my advisor, and then act on obvious noes. Yes, this meant that as a twenty-one-year-old, at least for those unsolicited manuscripts, I wielded the power of the form rejection. In this case, the editor informs you that you will be able to submit your manuscript after you make changes suggested by the reviewers. Reject and resubmit means the research article is rejected in its current form. I think its true that frequently the papers come back with very little changes. This happens with the regular revisions as well. Read the letter from the editor. In the meantime, authors should really put as much thought into how to respond to a review as they did in deciding where to submit. It is possible that the reviewer has made a mistake, but it is also possible that the reviewer was not able to understand your point because of a lack of clarity, or omission of crucial detail in your paper. The first thing to do is to reread and analyze the rejection letter you received. If you wish to appeal a decision, take the time to research that journals appeal process and review and address the points raised by the reviewer to prepare a reasoned and logical response. Add a comment. The most common responses to a submission are either a request to revise and resubmit the piece (also referred to as an R&R) or a rejection. If you do decide to resubmit the paper, please include a point-by-point response to the comments of the reviewers along with the new paper in order to expedite its review. Posted on January 5, 2022 At this point, the key is to not take the rejection of your manuscript personally. Personally, I would say that major revision would generally be a better option so long as the editor handling the ms. has the strength of character to insist that major does mean major, and reject revised versions that havent made major changes. Therefore, if you plan to resubmit to the same journal, make sure that you can reasonably address all the reviewers comments. You must log in or register to reply here. Learn more about peer review, including how to become a reviewer in our Reviewer Resource Center. Some of my predecessors had tried R&R with major revisions and R&R with minor revisions but that did not seem to me to have sufficient clarity as a signal to authors about how much work was needed Major R&R still seemed to generate the same pressures even if the revisions hadnt really fixed the problems. It is very common for papers to be rejected. Others see it as an opportunity to dismiss the feedback received and simply submit the unedited paper to another journal. It is interesting to read of the journals who have moved away from Decline and Resubmit. You saw a new email coming from a journal regarding the status of your manuscript submission. However, refrain from sending a protest email to the editor and complaining about the reviewers, because you may regret your action later. Is the paper well written? All of a sudden, you felt that all of your hard work went down the drain with that letter. The authors of such submissions will be given the opportunity to apply a major revision to their work and resubmit it after around 6 weeks. The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Click here to read Wileys review confidentiality policy and check the review model for each journal we publish. If you still find yourself confused as to what needs fixing, consider hiring a professional freelance editor like me to read the agents feedback, your manuscript, and provide developmental editing. My team created a decision Reject with invitation to resubmit, which seems to us to work pretty well. Are you suggesting that there can be for humanities a peer review like that used for PLoS One that focuses only on methodological soundness? Editors' advice to rejected authors: Just try, try again. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing. Reject and Resubmit (or revise and resubmit) (hereafter, R&R) = your article has been rejected. Rule 2: You must apply within 37 months of the original application's receipt date. Explain in a rebuttal document why you think the request is unnecessary. When editors, reviewers, and authors have put time into critiquing and improving a paper, it just seems downright unfair to reject the paper. (LogOut/ Rejection happens. Look for cross-oversfrom other fields of research; for example, new methods that might be connected to old problems. If so, what are they? Remember, however, that most reviewers and editors provide comments to help you improve the quality and readability of your manuscript. WebThe rejection reason was pathetic - saying it's a misfit for the journal. Perhaps the most important is that it is the editors job to publish good content. [CDATA[// >